3d printing hobby

Bill - as it relates to the finish on those helmets; are they directly off the printer or was there post-processing involved?

9 Likes

That is directly off the printer. Some are printed as multiple parts and glued together, but the only post processing was knocking off supports and cleaning up any strings.

(And installing shields for the eyes, and pads for the head.)

10 Likes

Wow! I have a Creality K1 Max and thought the finish was pretty pretty good. I may just need to look into upgrading to Bambu Labs! Very impressive!

10 Likes

You can really see the smoothness with the reflection on the black Tie Fighter helmet.

10 Likes

Love the Star Wars helmets!

9 Likes

These look great

8 Likes

Those look awesome! Great job!

7 Likes

:frowning:
If any of you are from Washington state, you may want to reach out to your reps.

It’s a whole thread of info but basically they’re using the tiny risk of someone printing gun parts to try and take away private ownership/use of any sort of CNC device software. Everything would have to be run through a government database to make sure you’re not printing something they don’t want you to print.
It’s a horribly written law that makes you a felon for not complying and likely guarantees the death of right to repair.

You can contact your legislator free of charge by calling the Washington State Legislative Hotline at 1.800.562.6000.

I’m certain the first conversation about this started from a good place, but that’s not where they’ve ended up.
:frowning:

11 Likes

I’ve been seeing a lot on this on Utube and yes it is whack! To me laws like this are a clear violation of the 4th amendment but as always that will only be considered down the road if it passes .

9 Likes

It’s even worse actually since it applies to subtractive processes too. That means your Glowforge and any stray CNC machines like mills, lathes, etc. all fall under this.

That ā€œdreamā€ of a standalone Glowforge is gone if this legislation goes through.

11 Likes

I guarantee you a legislator’s brother in law owns a company that sells and has a patent on 3D model blocking software.

11 Likes

I believe NY state is considering a similar bill.

3D printed guns are almost exclusively a novelty item, it’s cheaper & faster to go to almost any pawn shop (or inner city alley) and buy a nice metal multi-shot capable firearm.

10 Likes

This seems unlikely to deter actual criminals, who will use older devices, devices smuggled in from other places with more sensible laws, hacked firmware, hacked software, etc. Then, there is the reliability of the policing software. My guess is that the main thing it will accomplish is frustrating the heck out of (e.g.) cosplayers and prop makers, who will then resort to the methods in the preceding list. Another ineffective law from people who fundamentally don’t understand technology.

This keeps repeating in different niches. If the thought of 3D-printed ā€œghostā€ guns makes you uncomfortable, look into gene editing tech. People are having similar discussions about how the equipment and requisite knowledge to produce unique pathogens is getting cheaper and more accessible. We need a better strategy than untenably demanding the tech people make devices that can only run ā€œgoodā€ programs.

To the point from @jamesdhatch: this feels like a performative thing for politicians who can’t get traction on actual gun control laws to do.

10 Likes

Check out a guy: Louis Rossman in Tx. He left NYC due to the cities terrible treatment of small businesses. Is mostly a laptop/small electronic repair guy but the last 5-8 years pushing heavily on Right to Repair stuff. If he hasn’t already heard, I’m sure he’d wanna know.

His latest pet project is paying out bounties on breaking firmwares that lockout features people already paid for on devices they already own.

Also, been working on pushing back on the Ai flock cameras all these local governments are trying to put up everywhere to track everyone.

9 Likes

Oh, he knows!

9 Likes

Haven’t seen a rant pop up in a while. Last I saw he was on the warpath for his local parks installing the flock cameras.

7 Likes

Phillip Torrone of Adafruit making the same points I made:

https://blog.adafruit.com/2026/01/25/washingtons-3d-printing-bills-are-bad-for-stem-bad-for-business-and-bad-for-open-source-3d-printing/

10 Likes

Wow, amazing stuff. Makes me want to toss my Ender 3 and get a Bambu

8 Likes

A bit of an aside, but this feels like whataboutism…It’s both possible and reasonable to be concerned about both of these things.

That being said I’m more worried about the estimayed 500-550 million guns that are already out there in the US. Regulating 3d printing seems like it might be a solution for a problem that isn’t really there yet?

As popular as 3d printing is I still view it as a bit of a niche hobby. Seems like the intersection of ā€œpeople who want a ghost gunā€ and ā€œpeople who are good enough at 3d printing and have the right materials and adequately precise 3d printersā€ is vanishingly small compared to the installed gun base.

I’m operating on feel though. Maybe I just don’t have my finger on the pulse of the 3d printing/gun world. Actually I definitely don’t.

EDIT: updated the estimated US gun count to be more accurate. That’s even worse, around 1.5 guns per capita. Call me crazy but that seems like far more than enough. Ghost guns won’t help the situation but they also won’t move the needle; it’s already so far off the gauge, as it were.

9 Likes

You can have both!

7 Likes