Very unhappy that many of us are having to struggle without that tool. Im not sure I understand the Politics of why I am being denied .
Maybe someone can shed some light on this for me.
Anyone else feel the same.
3 Likes
No politics. @dan said it was based on the characteristics of each machine and the measurements they have for them. They’re enabling it on the machines where doing so is the least complex a problem.
I had Snapmarks but had to send my machine back. New one hasn’t gotten them. So pretty sure no politics are involved 
8 Likes
I hear your frustration, but it isn’t politics keeping people from getting Snapmark - it is the individual machine calibration. I hope you get the feature soon. I think Dan was pretty clear about the Snapmark rollout - and the fact that it could disappear as quickly as it appeared.
3 Likes
Wait, you think that this is CLEAR ?
" based on the characteristics of each machine and the measurements.
So my machine is mentally challenged ., lol ugh.
Clear as a Dark Cloud maybe.
No, not agreed. One thing we have all agreed to (if you read the fine print) is being subject to GF’s “beta” testing conditions. I’m personally very happy for the capabilities provided, and also for the opportunity to provide feedback where able in order to make future capabilities even better for everyone.
4 Likes
Actually, their Snapmark software is mentally challenged. It can’t handle our more complex machines
6 Likes
This is why we can’t have nice things. “I hope you brought enough snapmarks for everyone”.
8 Likes
Nope. I read all the agreements as well as Dan’s post and have no reason to think it’s “political.”
3 Likes
I think it’s interesting that you seem to think it’s personal. Why do you feel like you’re singled out?
4 Likes
Maybe I missed the joke, “struggle” seems like a bit much so I guess your tone must be meant as tongue-in-cheek. Sorry if I was being dense.
1 Like
Its cool if no one really understands it either., Its cool that you want to raise and salute to the glowforge bible of Beta ness.
look I love glowforge , its rocked my business, I have nothing but Praise man , I contribute whenever I can and now that I see that no one knows what going on or why… .
I feel better ,
Thank you
The Snapmark configuration is unique to each machine, different minute characteristics in the imaging and calibration. They cannot roll out one Snapmark overlay to all machines. They have to do one machine at a time, and apply carefully. So they certainly have enough Snapmark for everyone, and if they are going to keep it, it will eventually apply to all machines. It just takes time.
I would LOVE Snapmark, and I weep every morning and afternoon when it doesn’t show on my machine, but I will do an amazing happy dance when it is there.
Like everything else, it takes time.
6 Likes
Now is probably not the time to mention that I’ve had it for weeks and have yet to see a use case for them. Maybe I’m just not the target user? I need to make a universal snapmark jig, I bet I would use that.
8 Likes
Seriously, Dude, I had to work reeeealy hard to read that. Man, my vision sucks…
1 Like
Control-plus control-plus control-plus control-plus…
Then when you’re done control-0 resets you (or a bunch of control-minuses)
3 Likes
OOOOOOOOOh!..not sure you ought to be mentioning that. Was just having that discussion with another buddy off-board. 
2 Likes
I understand the reasoning but it is difficult to be waisting material and to also not be able to properly align things that need to be registered. I found it odd that I just got my machine two weeks ago and it doesn’t have snapmarks. Why would newer machines not be calibrated for the feature?
Based on the GF videos, I actually assumed that this was something built into the GF. I also watched a video of a passthrough print and that looked like a “snap” as well. Thankfully the community is here to show me that it’s not, but it’s still totally doable.
I’m quite handy and technically inclined…so I will just wait and hope it doesn’t “disappear” but rather “rolls out.” Crossing my fingers!
3 Likes
Yeah that’s what I was referring to. I just haven’t gotten to making it.
I have a bunch of 3” maple boards that are pretty tight fits for tray sides. I’ve been using single edge/corner cardboard jigs and it’s working fine but a snapjig would probably reduce the number of jobs.
1 Like
I think that was an eye test, wasn’t it?