Rumors about the Full Spectrum Muse Laser

There is camera control… but all I see is that the laser head is running a perimeter sweep before every cut they show… what the hell is the point of that if you placed by camera?!

I would like to have this right now on the GF tbh

1 Like

Do you have a conscious reason for why, or is it more of a gut feeling that you wish you had it?

I use the perimeter trace all the time for placing my material in the right location. And I likely will feel odd when I first do NOT use it. But if you have faith in the camera system placement, I fail to see the point of the perimeter trace.

Not trying to say “you are wrong” or anything like that. Just genuinely curious what I am overlooking that makes it desirable.

right now optical alignment isnt accurate enough for my uses. I know theyre working on accuracy and making advances every day. I also know I have an older version of the software than the beta testers and internal devs are using.

Unless Im directly under the camera right now its not reliable, and for the time being cutting directly under the camera is the last place you want to cut too. so its a bit of a pain if you mess up a cut or move your material to try to repeat that cut, but then again Ive been talking about this issue for a long while before I got my glowforge.

7 Likes

Cool, so not missing anything on the reason. Just the camera system does not yet warrant faith, so a secondary is desirable. Sweet.

1 Like

yeah. a 0,0 and numeric offset would be ideal.

I know there are a lot of tweaks they can do to the UI to get it closer to perfect, which I think they should continue to pursue, but it will never match the accuracy of a physical 0,0 and numeric offset.

4 Likes

Didn’t they say that the cameras take nine images and stitch them together for increased placement resolution?

Interesting they fix the corner over burn problem in exactly the way I proposed yesterday: Pre-Release | I am Groot

Odd he said it was 45W, which I have only seen on Glowforge Pro before. Their web advert says 40W.

Is it really shipping now?

2 Likes

They say that expected tube lifespan is 2 years WITH water cooling, and GF 2 years WITHOUT. That says something about tube quality.

1 Like

The Forge is liquid cooled too.

3 Likes

GF cooling is internal. A big advantage in my book. It does seem to make it very noisy though.

2 Likes

I wonder if the Muse has a chiller integrated into the cooling system, like the Pro has (but not the basic).

1 Like

It must have a large, front-mounted, air-cooled radiator full of coolant that in turn cools the water that is pumped through the laser, because he compared the water-cooling system in the Muse to the oil in an automobile engine.

…Unless I’m missing something about how cold water lubricates the gears and pistons of a laser tube, and carries away all the metal shavings and crud. :slight_smile:


edit: the cw-5000 water chiller is apparently just an air-cooled radiator full of anti-freeze with a small compressor and a pair of fans. So the cooling system in the muse is closer to the a/c system in a car, and not at all like the oil system.

3 Likes

I found the bigger z axis and the rotary options exciting but when you add in the cost of those items, you are getting up in the range of some of the Universal lasers that have been around for years and have a pretty good reputation. If the price for a fully equipped Muse really is close to a similarly spec’d Universal, I’d choose the Universal. If not for those features, I’m still intrigued by the reliability and ease-of-use promises of the Glowforge. I’ll continue to keep my eye on the Muse but, at this time, I don’t believe it meets my needs better than the other lasers.

4 Likes

My bad :yum: But still internal cooling is “cooler”, you got it? Cooler :sweat_smile:

3 Likes

Cloud software upgrade might be considered a downside by some - There are countless stories of new upgrades messing with some previously working workflow/functionality that you are at the mercy of the manufacturer. The ability to upgrade software certainly is a must, but the control of when and why upgrade is better when the end user is in control.

7 Likes

It might be running a perimeter to check for obstacles perhaps?

1 Like

That’s a very good point. I always panic when a new version of Matlab comes out. Often breaks old programs.

That’s the danger of early promotion of new ideas before you’re shipping. You’ve provided something for the competitors to aim for. Now if a competitor can short-circuit the dev process somehow and deliver 80% of what you’re promising earlier than you can deliver your 100% solution you’re at risk of losing sales. If the competitor does 80% + some things you won’t be doing with your “100%” solution, they start to look like the folks defining the market & the product.

That’s why you can’t be too late in delivering.

If this were the same price as a GF, I wonder how many people would take it rather than wait. They give up some stuff but they get other stuff and they get it now. FSL missed the boat by pricing it much higher than the GF. This also puts pressure on GF to deliver this summer - otherwise another delay starts to get weighed against getting the Muse then vs waiting for Godot. It’s always a tough call on how much to reveal how soon and there is never a right answer that’s obvious at the time. History tells whether someone was right or not. I don’t envy Dan and his team :slight_smile:

It is a derivative of their existing line in new clothes, but there’s enough cool new stuff to make it of interest to a segment of the market.

6 Likes

Could be an actual chiller unit vs the pump in a bucket. I’m okay with the bucket for my $350 K40, I’d want an active chiller for a $5K+ machine. LO’s chiller is certainly cheap enough that FSL could have those included (http://www.lightobject.com/CW5000-800W-Water-chiller-for-CO2-laser-machine-AC110V-60Hz-P823.aspx).

3 Likes