Glowforge doesn't appear to be cutting as expected

#1

The Glowforge isn’t cutting the way I expect it too.

So I’ve finally had a little bit more time to experiment with the Glowforge. I was creating a spam slicing device and noticed that my parts didn’t press fit. To calculate the kerf, I cut out a square and took the difference between the cutout and the hole and then divided by two. The Kerf came out to just under 0.1mm for the thick pg acrylic sheet.

I thought I would do test cut to see if I calculated the Kerf correctly, and now I’m more confused than before.

Here are the results.
I created a 25mm x 30mm shape in illustrator and sent it svg to the Glowforge.

I don’t think the Glowforge is being straight with me.
Here are my results and they don’t make sense to me.

Cut piece measurements
Top edge - 24.75mm
Bottom edge - 24.76mm
Left edge - 29.83mm
Right edge - 29.91mm

Hole
Top edge - 25.02
Bottom edge - 25.02
Left edge - 30.14
Right edge - 30.21

I would expect the top and bottom numbers to be similar and it should be true for the left and right edge, with maybe 0.02mm variation.

Another thing that didn’t make sense is that the Top and Bottom edge of the hole is very close to 25mm but I was expecting it to be much larger because of the kerf (maybe by 0.1mm).

Am I going about this all wrong or does anyone also suspect that my Glowforge is not being straight with me?

Thanks,

#2

That’s what makes cutting things with lasers a bit challenging. :slightly_smiling_face:

One of the things you are seeing with your measurements is that the kerf created by a laser burn does not run perfectly perpendicular when viewed in profile. It is slanted.

There is always a larger kerf measurement at the surface of a cut than there is at the base when the laser is focused at the surface of the material. It’s because the beam is actually shaped like an X, with the focal point at the center of the X. The intensity is greater at the center, and diffuses more as you get farther away from the focal point. So it burns more material away where the intensity is the greatest.

You can try just using an average of the two measurements to try and figure something out that works, or just do a few tests with a small 20 mm tab and slot file to determine the adjustments that make your tabs fit into your slots tightly. Or you can try varying the focal point to the center of the material to see if it gives you more uniform surface and base measurements.

Of the three, just doing a couple of test cuts is probably going to get you the best results. When you have determined what the kerf adjustment is for a particular material, it gives you a good starting point from then on, for that material.

#3

The top and bottom edge gives me an estimated Kerf of 0.135( 0.27/2 ).
The left edge gives me an estimated Kerf of 0.155( 0.31/2 ).
The right edge gives me an estimated Kerf of 0.15 ( 0.30/2 ).

The Kerf doesn’t appear to be too far apart so I don’t think that’s my issue.
I’m guessing it’s somewhere between 0.135 and 0.155.

I think the problem is that the laser isn’t cutting on the line like it should. If it did cut on the line then the cut piece would be approximately (25mm - Kerf by 30mm - Kerf) and the hole should be the opposite( 25mm + Kerf by 30mm + Kerf but this doesn’t appear to be the case.
Another thing to note is that since my top and bottom edges are measured to be 25.02 then the laser is cutting way inside the line.

#4

What program are you designing in? Care to upload the SVG that you sent to the Glowforge?

#5

It’s a super simple illustrator cs6 design.
I just drew a square and adjusted the dimensions to be 25mm by 30mm.

I zipped it.

KerfTestPattern.svg.zip (937 Bytes)

#6

Now, I’m going to either look like an idiot or not…

You said above:

Is your shape in the above file supposed to be exactly 25x30mm?

#7

Yup it should be exactly 25mm by 30mm.

#8

When I open the file in Illustrator CC2018, I get the following:

54%20AM
Screen Shot 2018-06-11 at 1.19.54 AM.png612x666 9.1 KB

#9

Hmmm,
I am using an old version of illustrator, cs6.
Even with those numbers my measurements don’t make sense.
The measurement of the hole would be larger than what I have.

Would be nice to be able to see the measurements in the Glowforge UI.
38%20PM

I also opened it in Graphics for Mac and I’m seeing 25mm x 30mm.

#10

For what it’s worth, your original document also was specified in pixels (in the SVG code).

What are your Save As settings when saving a SVG?

They should be:

50%20AM
Screen Shot 2018-06-11 at 2.01.50 AM.png958x1284 78.9 KB

#11

The only difference for my setting vs yours is Fonts.
I have mine set for Fonts - Types (Adobe CEF).

I changed it to Convert to outline but I still don’t see a difference.

48%20AM
Screen Shot 2018-06-11 at 12.10.48 AM.png522x645 44.3 KB

I’m getting sleepy, I guess I’ll try again tomorrow after I get off work.

Thanks Jules and JB for your input. :slight_smile:

#12

Interesting - I found an option in Illustrator I didn’t know existed (or know that I had enabled, at least). My preferences had “Use Preview Bounds” enabled and that was figuring in the stroke size.

Now that we’ve got that figured out… :slight_smile:

I just poured first cup of coffee, so I maybe should wait to reply. I know that the document is saving as pixels (the SVG is defining your shape as something like 70x88 pixels). And pixels are going to change depending on the program they are being viewed in (Illustrator uses 72 pixels per inch).

So I wonder if you don’t have some kind of scaling thing going on.

I use inches for all of my stuff (blasphemy, I know). But I set everything up as a 20”w x12”h artboard. This does a couple of things - it provides absolutel positioning based on the file and it also establishes a view box of a particular aspect ratio that the Glowforge can determine proper scaling (if units aren’t defined or arbitrary units like pixels are defined).

Or, maybe I’ve just complicated things. :slight_smile:

#13

Hmmm! I just opened the file in CS5, and I’m showing a straight 25 mm x 30 mm on the size as well.

kerftest
kerftest.JPG1235x903 87.2 KB

How odd, don’t know what’s going on. Might try a test cut or two later this morning if I get a chance.

#14

Yeah, but that’s nearly a decade old now. While one wouldn’t expect something simple like measurements to change, AI’s interpretation of svg files may have.

#15

For another data point. I also opened up in AI CC2018 and get 25x30. I also notice your path has both a fill and stroke which I have seen cause issues before.

image
image.png789x526 13.6 KB

#17

Does anyone know a way of testing to see if the laser is cutting along the line?

#18

I suppose one could set up a file with two squares laid directly on top of one another. One with a fill, one with a stroke. Engrave the fill and then score the stroke and that should give you an idea. The fill/engrave is going to engrave all the way to the shape boundary/vector path, and then the stroke is going to cut right on the vector path (you can see the set up if you go to view outlines in Illustrator).

#19

I’m going on a short family camping trip. I’ll try that when I get back next week.

#20

Thanks for letting us know about this. I’m sorry for the delay in my reply.

There are a lot of factors that can contribute to precision. Along with those mentioned above, here are a couple more things to look at:

  1. You may be able to improve your precision by following these instructions https://glowforge.com/support/topic/troubleshooting/perfect-squares
  2. Material thickness can also affect precision by creating thinner or wider kerf, which will affect the dimensions of your print.

I’m going to move this post to Everything Else so the discussion can continue.

Have a great camping trip!