Thats fine with me. good model. Even if GF offered me as little as 30% of the value as trade in or 10% buyback, bluebook, or X based on the number of hours on the Tube. All good.
Can I get an “amen” or “yes, that is a good model, GF should do that because their competitors do”
Consider this DEMOGRAPHIC:
I am one of the people who was in the market for an Epilog or boss, then GF started to advertize on AdWords and Youtube. I got sucked in with videos like this:
(pleanty more on their channel)
I resonably concluded:
“oh, ok, I can slowly pull my jobs in house with this machine and build a business”
My conclusion was false for many reasons. I own that.
(technical things like head alignment and performance aside, which I also feel burned by)
So, here we are, 2 years later, perfect condition GF with less than 500 hours on the tube. I am ready to “scale my business” but I am starting to see that this machine MIGHT BE a depreciated asset that had a value of $0 the day after I bought it.
Based on that, here are the possible outcomes:
1- Best outcome - GF does a buyback or trade in.
2- It sells on eBay, holding some value
3- It gets given away as a donation to a local school
4- worst outcome: no one wants it, ends up in a landfill
From there 2 more possible outcomes:
A: After being taken care of properly as a cutomer I put up some great videos and reviews showing how GF really does work to scale up a business just like it’s implied online.
-OR-
B: After being treated like sucker I switch companies and A still happnes, but with some other companies machine, feeling burned by my first Laser I remeber to always take shots that the company who burned me when I was starting out.
Now, do that to 100,000 people and what kind of “Brand” do you think forms in the mind of a consumer?
I am on that line.