How the competition replaces a CO2 tube

It’s used for the dielectric and insulation properties in high frequency signals, such as lasers and microwave. Other plastics used for insulators, like those used in common electrical tape, would actually retain a charge that messes with the signal.

3 Likes

Ah. Yes tape and electrical capacitance, makes sense.

Not to mention the connectors on the tube are nearly impossible to solder directly to. We spent a LONG time not wanting to use the “Wrap wire and tape, call it good enough” method, because everything I know about electrical work screamed for me to find another approach.

Most other directions I have seen about wiring for a tube have you put caulking on, instead of silicone sealant. But it sure looks like that is just another name for the same thing. A quick google search says the only difference between them is elasticity.

The main things Glowforge can do to make the replacement process easier would be to send out tubes with the wires for power and ground already connected. Then you just pop the lid open, disconnect the two wires on the old tube, disconnect whatever holds it to the gantry, swap out, secure new one to gantry, plug in 2 wires. Done.

4 Likes

As many innovations that the 'forge incorporates, I’ll bet there will be a handful of details the team thought of as development evolved.

Call me a simpleton (y’all wouldn’t be the first, probably), but I’d think that something like this would be the end goal?

2 Likes

Maybe more like a sparkplug connection for the high voltage wire. And keeping the high voltage and ground on separate connectors.

1 Like

If you watch the video, that essentially is what they have on the opposite end of the large red power cable. The main issue is the connection at the tube.

Most existing glass tube lasers consider the cable a reusable component, and leave it to the user to attach the cable to the tube. Which (for new users or the plain clumsy) can lead to broken tubes quite easily.

If Glowforge just considers the cable to be disposable along with the tube, that adds some cost to tube replacement, but removes some difficulty in exchange.

How and where would other plastics store a charge?

I suspect the only reason they use PTFE tape is that it’s very malleable and you can effectively do a very fine wrap around the terminal. Try wrapping something like that with electrical tape without breaking it.

I suppose it could also be possible to get some corona around those terminals without the PTFE. The voltage terminal to terminal isn’t super high but combined with a LF pulsed output and those sharp, pointy terminals you might see something :slight_smile: PTFE would be beneficial in this case too since it can be finely wrapped without leaving voids and gaps (unlike electrical tape)

I doubt there’s anything special about the power supply output “signal”, and certainly nothing that the insulation would effect. Maybe @aeva will chime in

Sounds like you haven’t done much work with electronics and dealt with electrostatic discharge.

Paragraph 1: Static electricity.

P2: If you Google it, you’ll find there’s reasons for everything. It’s definitely because of the insulation and rated properties of the plastic. Standard electrical tape is only rated up to 600V and 105c/220f. Bonus info: different coloured tape indicates different power phases to electricians.

P3: (no comment)

P4: Well, call it what you want… Signal, anode/cathode lead, driver lead. But it has to reliably charge and discharge the high voltage in order to maintain timing with the head motion so it can project a cohesive image. In that regard, the insulation can have a capacitive (as in: store excess charge) effect that will blur imaging.

Or hey, the vinyl tape used in standard electrical tape can smolder from the high voltage, gasses can enter the hopper chamber, combine with CO2 lasing, emit toxic gases… no big deal. :slight_smile:

Paragraph 1: Static electricity.

Exactly how and where would a static charge be deposited using PVC or rubber insulation and not using PTFE?

If you Google it, you’ll find there’s reasons for everything. It’s definitely because of the insulation and rated properties of the plastic

You’ll definitely have a solid reference for that then. Maybe a commercial application note describing failure modes caused by the use of something other than PTFE to insulate your leads and terminals

Electrical tape is 600V per wrap, by the way. Teflon tape is about 1kV per wrap. Neither are sufficient for insulating CO2 laser terminals, but because Teflon tape is so malleable you can easily use multiple wraps. Again, try doing that with any other insulating tape without damaging the terminal

But it has to reliably charge and discharge the high voltage in order to maintain timing with the head motion so it can project a cohesive image.

Sure. At what frequency? If we assumed the lead had a resistance of 1 ohm and the inter-lead capacitance is 500pF (which are ridiculously generous - actual values will be substantially lower) then the power supply can make use of frequency components up to 320MHz before you’ll see any distortion.

According to Sam's Laser FAQ - Carbon Dioxide Lasers under “Electrical Modulation of a CO2 Laser” the laser itself will filter out any pulsing above a few kHz. I.e. above a few kHz, you will get a CW output regardless of the input.

Even if “capacitance” was a problem, what part of it will be effected by the terminal insulation?

You have:

  1. Capacitance between the two leads, which is substantial but entirely unaffected by the insulation on the terminals
  2. Capacitance between the two terminals which is entirely unsubstantial (very close to 0pF)
  3. Capacitance between the HV terminal and ground which is entirely unsubstantial (very close to 0pF)

Wrapping the terminal with PTFE rather than PVC will have no substantial effect on a capacitance that was not substantial to begin with

For the most part, plastics will be insulators rather than retain a charge. Most static electricity is the result of friction or stripping of electrons (such as ripping tape off a surface). It’s called the Tribolectric effect.

Different materials exhibit different potentials to retain charges on their surface.

Granted, as a wrap, there’s not much chance of friction. If you actually Googled for a table of potential energy, you’d find that Teflon is for all practical purposes at the bottom of the list of all other plastics. Check out https://www.trifield.com/content/tribo-electric-series/ if you must.

If you want more exact details than that, I don’t have the patience for it.

Yes. Like putting on two coats provides double the insulation on a cold day. Except that’s a bad analogy based on the laws of thermodynamics and totally unrelated. But that’s also not important right now.

The real question is how much padding and stress you want to put onto a tenuous connection to a glass tube that, once snapped off, is likely unfixable short of replacing the tube.

I’m not going to engage in a long discussion about how much charge a material can hold when the key takeaways of using teflon are:

  • It’s thin for such delicate connections
  • It’s best for high frequency and high voltages “per wrap”

No, you clearly wanted an argument, full stop. I’m not inclined to waste my time satisfying your ego.

I can think of at least three inventions off the top of my head that were directed specifically at making tube installation simple. I can assure you it has next to nothing in common with that video, and requires exactly no plumbers’ tape.

7 Likes

Then perhaps you can clearly summarize what you’re arguing about, because honestly, I read your replies to my responses and all I see is you being offended at me answering your questions or you and I agreeing on various details. Your ego obviously wants me to say I’m wrong about something, so articulate it and let’s get on with our lives.

Well, glad that’s settled… we won’t have to deal with tape genders!
We don’t need no stinking tape! :sunglasses:

1 Like

I appreciate the exchange between @sam and @dan_berry. I felt that there was some strong energy connected to the posts as they developed, but couldn’t jump back in to allow the knowledge shared to come across stronger than the personality and energy of the posters. As an early participant in the question of using teflon tape, I am amazed at how this developed. I just don’t know enough about the physics involved to negotiate. I am intrigued though about the role static electricity and electrical capacitance play in tape. I naively assumed that an insulator was and insulator, case closed. Although I do recall the role cello tape played in making molecular thin carbon nanotubes and wanted to try this out. I am very edified by the whole discussion of electrical wires and the connection challenges to laser tubes and power supplies. And the whole mechanical issue of how to make good connections. I’m sure that the Glowforge will make this whole challenge easier for the consumer. Perhaps it would help to focus on the specific application on this particular laser and their recommended practices on the connection issue. This thread is about replacing a C02 laser and its challenges. Perhaps more illustrations of the varied ways this happens and why certain practices are recommended might assist us all in getting more familiar with the challenges we might face, or the problems the Glowforge will eliminate?

2 Likes

I’ll summarize in simplified terms, if I understand what @Sam is apparently so in an uproar about:

  • In the video they use Teflon tape
  • @Sam surmised that the use of thin tape was primarily because of the fragility of the CO2 connector, with a passing possibility of providing insulation from RF radiation at the wire connector itself, and very little chance of anything affecting the switching of the laser
  • I never disagreed that fragility was a possible reason, I recognize that given the thin nature of teflon tape… I just never acknowledged his public revelation. But in response to his question of “How and where would other plastics store a charge?” I raised the topic of ‘Static Electricity’ in answer to his question, either hoping he’d be familiar with the subject to see the relationship.
  • I admit I do not know the voltages and amperage involved with CO2 lasing, but various tapes have limitations that are well documented. Common electrical tape is one of them, making it inappropriate. One attribute I didn’t mention at the time was the rigidity of the tape itself, but I digress.
  • @Sam highlights that multiple layers adds a cumulative insulation for voltages. I agreed.
  • I mentioned the Tribolectric effect (at first without citing it by name) in which and had concerns charge/discharge is a factor in image quality, but no specifics because I had no experience relating to CO2 lasers or their specific power needs. @Sam at this point begins to want far more information than either of us can first-hand cite (even though he won’t admit it), except quoting web sites.

So @Sam, I apologize if you felt I was being condescending in tone towards your inquiries, but that wasn’t my intent. I truly, legitimately, have no time to research what you ask in order to engage you in a debate about the answers you seek. But realizing that neither of us had first-hand experience on the questions you were asking, I suspect your enthusiasm is less about seeking answers and more about being seen as the winner of any debate. (Edit: grammar)

I had almost spoken up at @dan_berry’s first response to speak toward the physics of the matter. But I couldn’t see anything in particular either of you said that would be strictly incorrect, and don’t have enough experience to be confident in saying these effects are quite minor. But I wanted to chime in at that point, because I did see the first post by @dan_berry as a bit unintentionally condescending, and predicted the thread evolving as it did. Hopefully everything has died down now (and I am not fanning flames)

Anyway, I am quite confident that the teflon tape is used 98% because of the fragility of the glass tube, and the other 2% because it is really hard to get anything else to stick in any reasonable way.

Using electrical tape is difficult because you need to keep the wire with the power strapped to the lead which goes into the tube. The multiple wraps you make to keep the wire in place make the electrical tape unable to reach (and thus stick to) the main post. Or with few wraps of the wire, you can too easily slide the wire right out under the electrical tape.

But… and this may be partially because of poor glass quality in chinese laser tubes… those tubes break to a stiff breeze. Look at them wrong, and you have a crack. So the easier any material is during that phase of attachment, the better. (I am overstating the fragility to a degree, but this is how you start to treat them after you do manage to break one doing something you thought was completely safe)

2 Likes

Thanks for stressing the potential fragility of a laser tube.
Nothing like the voice of experience.

1 Like