Hey, we need to help you get back to regular.
And I really respect your take on all this since you know the business end of making lasers and making things with lasers.
Hey, we need to help you get back to regular.
And I really respect your take on all this since you know the business end of making lasers and making things with lasers.
Most people keep a log anyway for going from machine to machine, but ULS and Trotec have saved material settings in their software. I understand why GF would drop this feature down the list though, itâs relatively low impact compared to the rest of the shipping features.
(whimper!)
You know what you told the kids about peer pressure right? Do whatâs right for you, because youâre the one who has to live with disappointing someone
On the other hand, with 1000 signups already, whatâs one more to add to the pile and maybe theyâve all been chosen anyway (although I think not from Danâs response to another post earlier).
I hadnât applied for the beta units myself. I started to fill out the application and then thought to myself self that I probably at the time couldnât commit enough time to its use to serve the teams needs. I think now I can and Iâm the perfect recipient of a prerelease unit! Just filled out the formâŚ
Iâm sure Iâll get one of the pre units because they have to have an old fart in the mix for testing.
Youâre absolutely right. Shame on me!
When dan keeps mentioning Proofgrade it is probably for two reasons. The most important is that the glowforge has been sold as select a design, place material in unit, press a button. Without Proofgrade materials this doesnât happen and a glowforge would just be a large, mostly hollow and very expensive brick for a lot of buyers.
For those of us who are engineers/artists/makers, etc⌠taking time to experiment with materials and really learn their properties is just what we expect. We can pretty much deal with whatever is delivered and improved later. In over a year of following Glowforge the company Iâve never seen any indication theyâll restrict the glowforge to Proofgrade only materials.
And the second reason is the ability to select-place-print-assemble is the difference between Glowforge the company being another DIY tool maker worth millions and the glowforge being the thermonuclear weapon in the pinterest wars and a potential billion dollar company.
From the sounds of the Beta users, they are being supplied with materials to use, and those are all proofgrade. So there just hasnât been any reason to set aside UI space for saving settings on personal material yet. And with UI being something that changes constantly until release (well, nowadays, just constantly), adding it in would not make much sense.
I agree that it seems like a day 1 feature. And I doubt it would come any later than that (really trivial to implement, as long as they are willing to let it look terrible)
This is the best and most concrete news thatâs come out to date. Dan didnât need to include the âwhatâs in, whatâs coming, whatâs extraâ - that is just super.
I had been thinking the same âOMG! Dan is normally so tight-lipped, so if he is showing us THIS, they have to be ready NOW!â
But, since the pre-release people will have no NDA⌠this letter WILL be posted on the forums. If it comes from Dan, people focus on the awesome. If it comes from someone who has never yet posted on the forums at all⌠who knows what people will focus on?
Not to say I am doom and gloom in my outlook. I am 100% rose tinted glasses mode. But my mind doth parse.
Just saying the ability to save settings from a previous job and material is a pretty basic setting. Proof grade recognition works but you will have re enter the settings each time you use non Proof Grade materials because we didnât finish that feature yet? seems like an odd thing not to have work out upfront.
That isnât exactly what they are saying. They said what is to come is a way to save settings for a specific user defined material. There was no reference about saving settings along with saving a specific job (which is what the few laser interfaces I have seen can do now).
Also, that is in the message for pre-release units.
What you said!
You just described my situation exactly
You will need to make a drawing/flat pattern of your parts to send to GF. Like @jbv said, 123Dmake can slice an otherwise 3D object into a series of 2D ones, but for the time being, GF canât work directly with 3D files unless something drastic has changed.
The workflow for inventor would be:
Create part file (.ipt)
Create drawing file (.idw)
Export to PDF
or
Save Copy As -> Save as Type [.DXF] when .dxf functionality is up and running.
Note this will only work for parts where your thickness is less than or equal to the material GF is able to cut, 1/4" (or 1/2" with a flip)
EDIT: added âless than orâ.
You just described my situation exactly
Same here. Now I have the time and a pressing need to turn out a fair number of projects pretty quickly. I could use my CNC, but Iâd really rather not.
@dan so 3 questions first if we get the pre-release unit we will get a production run later on at no cost
second earlier you guys mention a software that you would send us in the event that your company ceased so we could use the printer offline
and third Sounds awesome great job
I can answer that truthfully in that the letter Dan posted is what I received. [quote=âdan, post:1, topic:3590â]
If you choose to receive a pre-release unit, it will remain our property. We might need to make changes or improvements. We will replace it later with the production unit you ordered
[/quote]
thanks and my big one is that offline software?
Do you get Beta User near your name?
How that is going to be done is still to be determined. I havenât seen anything new on that topic for a while. Check out topics that say âfirmware releaseâ.