I agree, numeric positioning, rotation and scaling would be really helpful.
Chuckle! Better to squeee than pop! This one’s kind of a big deal!
This sounds like a good and welcome feature. If it isn’t permanent, can you comment on what might replace it and how that would be better?
hopefully it will be implemented natively!
Oh very cool. Yep I look forward to some testing.
Why does this remind me of my teenage days of acne?
LOL, both of my dogs came running from across the house when I played that SQUEE video. They completely lost it the whole time it was playing!
Did you choose the Worlds Cutest Frog video because it’s a quick little “hopper” item? Sorry, couldn’t resist.
Chuckle! Yes to both the squeee and the hopper! (Every time @dan says “It’s in the hopper” that little guy pops into my head.)
Okay, I know it’s weird…I’ve learned to live with it.
This is exactly correct.
No, we are full up delivering on our existing commitments. We won’t make new ones now.
Is that like “Every time @dan says the word ‘hopper’ an angel loses its wings?”
Four 1" squares at .75,11;17.75,11; .75,1.5;17.75,11 in Inkscape. Brought into UI. NoGo zone shows up but disappears with one nudge on the left squares at 100% resolution.
OK, but I was referring to this earlier reply from you in the 1st post of this thread:
Will it be sticking around until you come up with something better?
Marion, did you place the squares with a visual placement in the GF interface or in the Inkscape software?
I’m not going to make any predictions. (And it’s not my decision in any case!)
What is on the screen capture is how it was laid out in Inkscape and imported without any manipulation. I’m still not quite sure how helpful this will be, but at least it’s something to think about.
Oh yeah baby!
Okay, that’s great…thanks!