He makes some good points and does a fine job of discussing joinery. Don’t know about the “cauterizing” thing. Might have to get Mathias Wandel to do some independent testing.
He also didn’t discuss the strength of finger joints when using solid wood rather than plywood. These hold up better than plywood even laser cut.
It is a good point to make. For boxes that will have a lot of diagonal stresses or twist, the typical finger joint isn’t going to deal with those stess completely.
Would be interesting to test a box made with two layers of finger joints, but with fingers offset in the layers to overlap differently. Of course you are going to have a stronger box with another layer over it. Come up with a design that uses one layer that is just as strong. Now that would be some cool engineering.
Oh yes, and don’t in my sandbox! I’m playing in it and I kind of like it this way.
I was not aware! I did see @m_raynsford’s other post, and leafing through it, noticed that many of the designs that had caught my eye from the forum had all been by the same guy. It’s an impressive body of work. And I came across the sharks blog completely independently today and had no idea.
I suspect I’m way down the shipping list. I ordered my laser based on the strength of continuous autofocus and the ability to flip the material over to cut through 12mm from the other side.
I haven’t forgotten about these ‘impossible’ features and that GF still haven’t even demonstrated it’s possible in principle, let alone implemented it for everyone to use.
I’m also definitely not a GF cheerleader, I’ve seen enough lasers to be objective about my reviews and I get the impression that’s not the kind of feedback they’re looking for at the moment.
The feature I would have like to compensate for a lower power basic. I hope it goes live sometime.
I don’t even know how that would work with cameras and no fiducials in the bed. The more I think of it, the less I imagine that it will come to fruition. If I could only understand the defined scope and use cases that are intended by double sided cutting, maybe.
It’s like the pass through slot. At the moment in the interface there is nothing to indicate to me that there is any type of automatic placement of a design for materials moving through the slot. How would that even work?
Is it really possible for the lid camera and software to map the material and then assist in placing the design accurately over that map? I guess it is possible, but I don’t see indications of the software getting built out to it, other than some improvements in improved image processing.
Without those features the head camera is completely pointless. The material barcode can be read by the lid camera and both cameras are little more than a gimmick anyway.
Fiducial marks for alignment would be really useful for alignment. While I believe those things are possible (former life in vision recognition software) I notice that they’ve been secretly dropped off the list of functions. I bought the machine based on the strength of things they don’t appear to be supplying anymore. It’s almost pointless asking them if they intend to supply it too, without a proof of concept (which they don’t have time to do) they don’t know if it’s possible to supply the features they promised to supply.
We’re talking 1999-2005, specialised capture cards to get data into the machine at 60FPS, we were writing our own software to process images, do pattern matching etc. Open CV makes everything a lot easier now and you can squeeze it all onto a raspberry pi which is actually faster than the first machine we had.
In fact at the 1999 Robot football world cup in Dubai by coincidence everyone had identical machines, 400mHz CPU with 64mb SDRAM. It was definitely a squeeze doing perspective corrections and identifying 13 objects within the field of view at 60FPS.
I haven’t seen it do anything yet. When you hit ‘print’ it does “scan” your material. But that seems to be just a superfluous action. Maybe it is actually scanning, then feeding that information to Glowforge HQ and is being reviewed for future upgrades? Like Implementation of flip to etch. Don’t know. Just half hazarding a guess.