I forgot, the parsers are hovering.
The percentage is going to be dependent on your definition of delivered. For instance although some features are binary (“will support direct DXF” which has not been delivered in any form), others are on a continuum. 3D engrave is only activated for PG acrylic although by copying the settings it can be enabled for any material. Is that a “delivered” or a fail?
Others features are like support for long materials in the pass through. Works with sub-millimeter accuracy but requires user attention to setup & execution. The automagic handling isn’t there.
Support for full 1/2" cuts does not require flipping for some materials and for others it won’t ever work even with flipping the material.
Automagic recognition of iPads isn’t there but you can certainly engrave (mark) an iPad without any “workarounds”. Just place, align, set and print.
So use whatever denominator and numerator you want and feel free to come up with any percentage that floats your boat.
For some people it does not & will not ever meet more than zero of their needs/wants - those are the folks who are looking for physical limit switches. Or who are unimpressed by an additional .4" of material length support because the .5" of height loss forever puts the whole thing in the fail mode.
For others who want/need 1/1000" precision for all of their work, it’s pretty much zero for them too but may be delivered in future software releases.
For most people it does everything needed for almost every task. That’s to say it cuts and engraves and allows for visual alignment with reasonable precision.
Even for me (& I have 2 other lasers to supplement if needed) it does everything I need it to do and easier than either of the other lasers except very thick pass-thru materials & tall objects (the Redsail has 9" of Z-axis travel with full drop down doors for the pass through). I’ve only needed the Redsail once since I got the PRU and I would have been able to do it on a GF Pro.
So pick whatever measure of accomplishment or non-accomplishment that justifies your feelings about GF. Bottom line though, most people will be able to do everything they need with the beta software. If they can’t then they should wait to take delivery when it’s done because it does everything they say it does in your acceptance decisioning email.
I also expect that most people will also have something they want it to do or they think it “should” do because every other laser does it (which is not correct - get a K40 to see the low end and then find a $5000 laser to see what’s the norm at this price point - “all lasers” don’t do what most pundits say they do). Those are features which were not promised but that wont stop people from declaring the gap between their wants & perceptions as a GF failure.
At the end of the day, if you’re inclined you can find ample justification for believing GF has failed miserably. And if you’re otherwise inclined you can make wonderful things the day it shows up at your door.