The following template lets you experiment with the results of Speed vs Power for unknown materials (or existing known materials where you want to further experiment with the results). You can:
toggle the types of tests to perform
choose a color for each test
set min/max Power and Speed settings
indicate how many gradations should be used for each setting
User beware though: if you do a 6x6 grid as shown in the example youâre looking at manually configuring 72 different steps for the cuts and engraves (not to mention scores and outer cuts). This wonât be easy to set up in the Glowforge interface.
While Iâm sure there is a case where this might be useful for the vast majority of projects all you really need to know is one dimension. That is, you set the power or speed at a fixed amount and you vary the other value. This will reduce the number of config steps you do while still getting the results you need.
For cutting, in general the best plan is to go hot and fast, e.g. full power at the fastest speed that will cut through. This is why my preferred test method only has one row.
When cutting in some cases of really thin materials you wonât get a good result at full power, so then you set the power to some lower value like say 50% and then vary the speed, same idea.
Itâs rare that a grid like this will yield better results when cutting. For more information and a template that doesnât require a Cuttle membership check out #6 in the FAQ.
As for if a grid helps with engraving, thatâs subjective. If you think itâs useful and donât mind joining Cuttle then this is a neat grid maker.
@evansd2 Iâd like to offer some observations/corrections:
With a 6x6 grid and the compliment of Engrave, Score and Cut shapes, there would be over 108 settings to establish (6x6x3 + 1 annotation + 1 swatch cut). I agree this is time-consuming in the GF UI which is why the design offers a flexible choice of Power vs Speed settings that fully allows the user to go as simple or as complex as they want.
In my case, I was building a cribbage board for a client whose logo that was being engraved that had two shades of gray and two shades of red and it was a challenge for me to figure out the desired Power vs. Speed settings (not to mention the Score and Cut settings) that would get the result I was after. I got tired of experimenting and decided to put this tool together.
I decided that should a future need arise that calls for the material I used for this project, having a swatch with the settings I tried would be very helpful (at least to me).
With the swatch that I now have, I firmly believe my future engrave projects will be much faster as I now know that (for the material I was using) I can get the same general effect at 100% power @ 1200 to that of 10% power @ 200.
I tend to agree that for cutting, full power at the fastest speed is best. Arriving at this speed is a bit of a challenge for unknown materials.
I donât believe persons have to join Cuttle to use this.
I used to create things like this when I was new to the machine. Very useful for newcomers to get a handle on how to change settings to produce different results. âAâ for effort..
I gave up on âswatchesâ when I realized even Proofgrade would give different results (engraving). If it matters, I run a small test before committing to a big project.
You do have to create a free account to download the svg. Iâve kept a free account since Cuttle was first introduced, itâs totally worth it for all the free designs you can download, and the ability to modify them parametrically and then download the svg of your adjusted design is ab fab.
It takes a small strip of material and one quick row of small cuts. For a performance machine I get the right settings in under 2 minutes all in. Set focus is the slowest part.